Friday, April 11, 2008

Leadership training for Mega Fans in Kurnool


Pawan Kalyan who was in London tour was back in Hyderabad on 9th April.He is a happy man as his film collected around Rs.20 crores in the first week itself.Pawan is attending the Vizag family court today ,11th April.
Police is making all security arrangements. Pawan is attending the Family court in two cases- One is alimony case that filed by Nandini and the other case is divorce that was filed by Pawan. Pawan is attending third time in Vizag court tomorrow with reference to his cases.

Pawan back from london to attend court

Pawan Kalyan who was in London tour was back in Hyderabad on 9th April.He is a happy man as his film collected around Rs.20 crores in the first week itself.Pawan is attending the Vizag family court today ,11th April.
Police is making all security arrangements. Pawan is attending the Family court in two cases- One is alimony case that filed by Nandini and the other case is divorce that was filed by Pawan. Pawan is attending third time in Vizag court tomorrow with reference to his cases.

JALSA collects 20+ crores share in 1st week

Pawan Kalyan's Jalsa was released on 2nd April and it completed a week days run on 9th April. So far the film has collected the share of Rs20+ crores in its first week run.
The detailed collections(area wise are al below) :
In Nizam --------------------------- Rs6+ crores
In Ceded----------------------------Rs3+ crores.
In Krishna------------------------ Rs1.16 crores
In Guntur ----------------------------Rs1.31 Croes.
Even in US the film is doing well at the box office and it is known that the film has collected RsOne Crore rupees as distributor share with Rs 30 lakhs profit share to exhibitors.
As for the trade reports, Jalsa is going to create new records in foist week collections-
Stay tuned for actual figures (collections) of the first week Jalsa run.

Saturday, March 29, 2008

India surrender after Virender-----March 29, 2008


A score of 159 for 9 in 49.1 overs sounds exciting. Fast bowlers running in hard on the fourth day, extracting bounce and rattling stumps, ought to be entertaining. Batsmen looking to score, bowlers trying to restrict from one end and attack from the other, fielders charged up, a hundred, some gorgeous strokeplay ... all points to an exciting day's cricket. What a near-capacity stadium witnessed, though, was far duller. A game which had sprung to life yesterday was put to bed once again.
India needed to show some initiative towards building a big lead, declare their intent and go for a win. Virender Sehwag didn't last too long but the rest paled in comparison when it came to setting the agenda. Rahul Dravid preferred to continue his guarded approach, Mahendra Singh Dhoni couldn't summon his dashing side and VVS Laxman, stuck with the tail, scratched around towards the end.
South Africa bowled much better today - no doubt about it - but India must ensure against an over-reliance on Sehwag, a trap they fell into regularly four years back. There was a time, around 2004, when Sehwag used to stand out from the rest of the batting order. Against Australia in 2003-2004 and Pakistan in early 2005, a few games changed complexion the moment he was dismissed. The Bangalore Test against Pakistan was a classic example. As long as Sehwag was in, India harboured hopes of winning; once he left, the rest couldn't even bat out two sessions.
Several opposition bowlers pointed out to how tough it was to bowl to Sehwag compared to the others. The common refrain was: Sehwag rattled your plans, the rest at least scored more predictably. Mohammad Asif even went to the extent of saying it was comparatively easy to bowl to Dravid because he rarely tried anything different.
The happenings today was some sort of a throwback to the days of Sehwag-dominated shows. As long as he was around, India could dream of 700 in quick time. Once he left, the rest couldn't summon the unconventional methods to counter the bowling. South Africa did bowl well but they were probably made to look a little better by batsmen adopting the straightforward approach.
Nobody, though, will doubt the intensity levels. Makhaya Ntini, who's not been that potent a force in the subcontinent, nipped out two early wickets in six balls before Dale Steyn put together the spell of the match that read: 8-1-15-4. It was his sixth spell and was delivered in the demanding mid-afternoon session and came with reverse-swing of high quality. He cranked up speeds around 145kph and kept it dart straight.
The ball to dismiss Dhoni was particularly fearsome, making the batsmen look rather silly for trying to walk down the track. "I didn't really see him charging," said Steyn. "I had always made up mind that we would two bouncers with the new ball that we had just got. So he is a big wicket for the way that he plays he can take the game away from anybody on his day. He wanted to score quickly so that was a key wicket to get."
There was some deadly reverse-swing as well, giving the tailenders no chance. Once it was straight and swinging, Steyn was always going to win the day. It was the sort of spell that set up their win in Pakistan last year and he showed he could let rip in tough conditions. "These balls are different to the balls that we play with, the Kookaburra balls," he said. "The key is to find out what works. Reverse-swing is a big factor in the subcontinent. We were lucky to get a ball change and the new ball that we got was reversing from ball one basically. I think now what we have to do is to come up with a good plan on how to get the ball to do that."
It also helped that India were going for the runs. "The fact that we were trying to push it along probably cost us a few wickets," said Dravid. "The idea was to push it along, in the end Steyn came and bowled a good spell of reverse swing. We couldn't accelerate with wickets falling."
All of which meant that the match is back to square one. India need someone to do a Sehwag with the ball if they aim to win this one. South Africa need something even more special if they are to even get close. Expect a good crowd on Sunday but, unless you're going for broke in a lottery, don't expect a result.

Friday, March 28, 2008

'The best Test match innings I've ever seen' - Arthur


Siddhartha Vaidyanathan in Chennai
March 28, 2008

Mickey Arthur, the South African coach, said he had not visualised the game taking such a course in his "wildest dreams", admitting that he had not seen a better Test innings than Virender Sehwag's 309 in Chennai.
"I thought if they want 400, it would probably be about lunch time or after tomorrow," he said at the end of a day when South Africa conceded 386 runs. "Last night I looked at every possible scenario that could develop and this wasn't one. I didn't think in my wildest dreams they would score at such a rate. Again that's only due to one man."
Arthur couldn't stop gushing about Sehwag's monumental effort, a triple-hundred struck at a quickfire rate. "I think that's the best Test-match innings I've ever seen," he said. "The way he played today was absolutely amazing. We tried to attack him, we defended against him, tried to bowl straight lines, bowl wide, over the wicket, round the wicket, did everything possible. And he countered us.
"When Veeru is batting he scores so quickly and in unconventional areas. The moment you changed the fielder he reverse-swept and hit over square leg. It was a fantastic innings and obviously put India in a very good position."
He didn't think there would be too much of a buzz in their hotel rooms tonight - "I think at seven o clock the boys will all be sleeping" - but he did mention the crumbs of comfort his side could take from this shellacking.
"I'm battling to think of any positives at the moment but what I do think is a couple of our younger bowlers learnt a lot about bowling in the subcontinent," he said. "Dale is young, Morne Morkel is in his fourth Test, and Harris has played only a few Tests. They've learnt some valuable lessons in how to play in the subcontinent today.
"I know we've got the attack to take 20 wickets in a Test. I think it [the pitch] was really flat and the conditions pretty stifling. We played on wickets like this in Pakistan. They were flat in Bangladesh. But obviously you take into account the quality of batters you bowl at. I still maintain that we have the attack to take 20 wickets. I think we were beaten by a champion player today."
Did he think there was only one team that could win this match from now or did South Africa have any chance? "There's a lot of cricket to be played," he said. "But the way it's looking we're obviously looking to get as much of a lead as possible and try and have a go on day five. They're probably in a really good position now and it's up to us to counter that early. I do think that if we get Veeru out early, we have a good chance of keeping that run-rate in check and making it a lot longer for them to get ahead of us."
Harris didn't make any sort of impression today but Arthur hoped he could come into his own in the second innings. "I don't think it turned much, we didn't expect it to turn much on the first three days and I think it's going to be difficult. Harbhajan and Kumble didn't turn it too. We tried to use Harris in a restrictive role. For him to go over the wicket, round the wicket ... but it didn't happen. But that was the plan. A spinner comes into his own on day four and five."

Twenty20 Playing Conditions


The Laws of cricket apply to Twenty20 with some exceptions:
Each bowler may bowl a maximum of only one-fifth of the total (generally 4, for a full, uninterrupted game) overs per innings.
Umpires may award 5-run penalty runs at their discretion if they believe either team is wasting time.
If the fielding team doesn't start to bowl their 20th over within 75 minutes, the batting side is credited an extra 6 runs for every whole over bowled after the 75 minute mark; the umpire may add more time to this, if he considers the batting team is wasting time.
The following fielding restrictions apply:
No more than five fielders can be on the leg side at any time.
During the first 6 overs, a maximum of two fielders can be outside the 30-yard circle.
After the first 6 overs, a maximum of five fielders can be outside the fielding circle.
If the match ends with the scores tied and there must be a winner, the tie is broken with a bowl-out (similar to a penalty shoot-out in football), with five bowlers from each side delivering 1 ball each at an unguarded wicket. If the number of wickets is equal after the first five balls per side, the bowling continues and is decided by sudden death.
Should a bowler deliver a no ball by overstepping the popping crease, it costs 1 runs and his next delivery is designated a free-hit, from which the batsman can only be dismissed through a run out, for hitting the ball twice, obstructing the field or handling the ball, as is the case for the original "no ball".

[edit] Impact
On July 15, 2004, Middlesex vs. Surrey (the first Twenty20 game to be held at Lord's) attracted a crowd of 26,500, the largest attendance for any county cricket game other than a one-day final since 1953.
On January 12, 2005, Australia's first Twenty20 game was played at the WACA ground between the Western Warriors and the Victorian Bushrangers. It drew a sellout crowd of 20,700.
On February 17, 2005, Australia defeated New Zealand in the first men's full international Twenty20 match, played at Eden Park in Auckland. The game was played in a light-hearted manner - both sides turned out in kit similar to that worn in the 1980s, the New Zealand team's a direct copy of that worn by the Beige Brigade. Some of the players also sported moustaches/beards and hair styles popular in the 1980s taking part in a competition amongst themselves for best retro look, at the request of the Beige Brigade. Australia won the game comprehensively, and as the result became obvious towards the end of the NZ innings, the players and umpires took things less seriously - Glenn McGrath jokingly replayed the Trevor Chappell underarm incident from a 1981 ODI between the two sides, and Billy Bowden showed him a mock red card (red cards are not normally used in cricket) in response.
The first Twenty20 international in England was played between England and Australia at the Rose Bowl in Hampshire on the 13th June 2005, which England won by a record margin of 100 runs. On January 9, 2006, Australia and South Africa met in the first international Twenty20 game in Australia. In a first, each player's nickname appeared on the back of his uniform, rather than his surname. The international match drew a crowd of 38,894 people at the The Gabba. Australia convincingly won the match with man of the match Damien Martyn scoring 96 runs.
On February 16, 2006, New Zealand defeated West Indies in a tie-breaking bowl-out 3-0; 126 runs were scored apiece in the game proper. The game was the last international match played by Chris Cairns - NZC handed out life-size cardboard masks of his face to patrons as they entered the ground.
Starting July 11, 2006, 19 West Indies regional teams competed in what was named the Stanford 20/20 tournament. The event has been financially backed by billionaire Allen Stanford, who gave at least US$28,000,000 funding money. West Indies legends also backed the programme, and several "looked after" the teams during their stay in and around the purpose built ground in Antigua. It is intended that the tournament will be an annual event. Guyana won the inaugural event, defeating Trinidad and Tobago by 5 wickets.[1] The top prize for the winning team was US$1,000,000, but other prizes were given throughout the tournament, such as play of the match (US$10,000) and man of the match (US$25,000).[2]
On January 5, 2007, Queensland Bulls played the New South Wales Blues at The Gabba, Brisbane. A crowd of 11,000 was expected based on pre-match ticket sales. However, an unexpected 16,000 turned up on the day to buy tickets, causing disruption and confusion for surprised Gabba staff as they were forced to throw open gates and grant many fans free entry. Attendance reached 27,653.[3][4]
For February 1, 2008's Twenty20 match between Australia and India, the Melbourne Cricket Ground was sold out based on pre-ticket sales and 84,041[1] people attended the match involving the Twenty20 World Champions against the ODI World Champions.

Twenty20


Twenty20 is a form of cricket, originally introduced in the United Kingdom for professional inter-county competition by the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB), in 2003. Both teams have a single innings and bat for a maximum of 20 overs.
A Twenty20 game is completed in about three hours, with each innings lasting around 75 minutes, thus bringing the game closer to the timespan of other popular team sports such as football. It was introduced to create a lively form of the game which would be attractive to spectators at the ground and viewers on television and as such it has been very successful. The ECB did not intend that Twenty20 would replace other forms of cricket and these have continued alongside it.
The game has spread around the cricket world. On most international tours there is a Twenty20 match and most Test-playing nations have a domestic cup competition. The inaugural ICC World Twenty20 was played in South Africa in 2007 with India defeating Pakistan in the final.